Local Communities in the Context of Co-production of Public Goods: Regional Cases
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47850/RL.2025.6.4.117-137Keywords:
territorial public self-government, TPSG, self-organization, local communities, co-production, public goods, grant, Novosibirsk region, Irkutsk Region, Republic of KhakassiaAbstract
The study is devoted to identifying the regional features of the process of public goods production, in which territorial public self-government (TPSG) participates together with the state. The study area includes three regions: the Irkutsk Region, the Novosibirsk Region, and the Republic of Khakassia. The empirical base of the study consists of 1,140 grant projects implemented by TPSs in these regions between 2018 and 2024.
The study provides a description of the institutional conditions under which TPSG produce public goods in each region. The analysis of the content of the produced goods is carried out. It is shown that the differences in the institutional support of the existing TPSG are accompanied by differences in the volume of public goods produced by the TPSG, as well as certain differences in the content of the activities of the TPSG supported by grant financing.
It is concluded that common trends are unfolding in all regions: the prevalence of activities related to the improvement of territories; the presence of a pronounced effect of "increasing beneficiaries"; and a significant volume of projects related to the preservation of historical and cultural heritage and patriotic education.
References
Березутский, Ю. В., Митрофанов, Д. В. (2023). Территориальное общественное самоуправление как инструмент вовлечения населения в решение вопросов местного значения (на примере г. Хабаровска). Власть и управление на Востоке России. № 4 (105). С. 138-150. DOI: 10.22394/1818-4049-2023-105-4-138-150.
Berezutskiy, Yu. V, Mitrofanov, D. V. (2023). Territorial Public Self-government as a Tool for Involving the Population in Solving Issues of Local Importance (on the example of Khabarovsk). The Power and Administration in the East of Russia. No. 4(105). Pp. 138-150. DOI: 10.22394/1818-4049-2023-105-4-138-150. (In Russ.)
Бреславский, А. С., Скворцова, Ю. П. (2021). Территориальное общественное самоуправление в Республике Бурятия: опыт реализации гражданских инициатив в 2010-е годы. Улан-Удэ: Изд-во «Оттиск».
Breslavsky, A. S., Skvortsova, Yu. P. (2021). Territorial Public Self-government in the Republic of Buryatia: The Experience of Implementing Civil initiatives in the 2010s. Ulan-Ude. (In Russ.)
Гордиенко, А. А. (2005). Территориальное общественное самоуправление в местном сообществе. Новосибирск.
Gordienko, A. A. (2005). Territorial Public Self-government in the Local Community. Novosibirsk. (In Russ.).
Зазулина, М. Р. (2024). Местные сообщества в условиях сопроизводства общественных благ (на примере деятельности ТОС Новосибирской области). Respublica Literaria. Т. 5. №. 4. С. 86-100. DOI: 10.47850/RL.2024.5.4.86-100.
Zazulina, M. R. (2024). Local Communities in the Context of Co-Production of Public Goods (Using the Example of TPSG Activities in the Novosibirsk Region). Respublica Literaria. Vol. 5. № 4. Pp. 86-100. DOI: 10.47850/RL.2024.5.4.86-100. (In Russ.)
Медведева, Н. В., Фролова, Е. В., Рогач, О. В. (2021). Взаимодействие и перспективы партнерства территориального общественного самоуправления с местной властью. Социологические исследования. № 10. С. 72-82. DOI: 10.31857/S013216250015275-5.
Medvedeva, N. V., Frolova, E. V., Rogach, O. V. (2021). Territorial Public Self-government and Local Government: Problems of Interaction and Prospects for Constructive Partnership. Sociological Research. No. 10. Pp. 72-82. DOI: 10.31857/S013216250015275-5. (In Russ.)
Чекрыга, М. А. (2023). Территориальное общественное самоуправление в муниципальных образованиях субъектов Российской Федерации Сибирского федерального округа. Актуальные проблемы российского права. Т. 18. № 9 (154). С. 21-37. DOI: 10.17803/1994-1471.2023.154.9.021-037.
Chekry`ga, M. A. (2023). Territorial Public Self-government in Municipal Entities of the Constituent Entities of the Siberian Federal District. Actual Problems of Russian Law. Vol. 18. No. 9(154). Pp. 21-37. DOI: 10.17803/1994-1471.2023.154.9.021-037. (In Russ.)
Шагалов, И. Л. (2019). Эффекты сопроизводства социальной инфраструктуры местными сообществами в России. ЭКО. № 4 (538). С. 153-172. DOI: 10.30680/ЕСО0131-7652-2019-4-153-172.
Shagalov, I. L. (2019). The Effects of Co-production of the Social Infrastructure in Russia. ECO. No. 4 (538). Pp. 153-172. DOI: 10.30680/ЕСО0131-7652-2019-4-153-172. (In Russ.)
Шомина, Е. С. (2015). Соседские центры как элемент инфраструктуры соседского сообщества Экономические и социально-гуманитарные исследования. № 4 (8). С. 95-104.
Shomina, E. S. (2015). Community Centers as Element of Neighboring Community Infrastructure. Economic and Social Research. No. 4 (8). Pp. 95-104. (In Russ.)
Ackerman, J. (2004). Co-Governance for Accountability: Beyond “Exit” and “Voice”. World Development. Vol. 32. No. 3. Pp. 447-463.
Gurgur, T. (2016). Voice, Exit and Local Capture in Public Provision of Private Goods. Economics of Governance. No. 17. Iss. 4. Pp. 397-424.
Ostrom, E., Parks, R. B. & Whitaker, G. P. (1978). Patterns of Metropolitan Policing. Cambridge. MA: Ballinger Publishing Co.
Ostrom, E. (1996). Crossing the great divide: Coproduction, synergy, and development. World Development. Vol. 24. No. 6. Pр. 1073-1087.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
https://oc.philosophy.nsc.ru/remote.php/webdav/%D0%94%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%BE%D1%80%20%D1%81%20%D0%B0%D0%B2%D1%82%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%BC%20RL-%D0%BF%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B2.doc
